Skip to main content

Microservices

 This week, we read an article called Microservices by James Lewis and Martin Fowler, which did a great job explaining the differences between monolithic applications and those that run on microservices (and the ones that use a little bit of both). They explained the advantages and pitfalls of implementing any of these methods, and they conclude that while microservice-based applications seem promising, it's still too early to tell whether they'll be better than monolithic ones. Luckily for us, this article was published in 2014, and we're far enough in the future to know that they are, in fact, more widely used today.

Before reading this article, I was already aware of these different types of applications, and I knew that the market had a preference towards microservice applications, but I hadn't realized how much this change had affected how businesses are run today. From personal experience, I belong to a cross-functional (XFN) team that dabbles in many different products, all of which are owned by somewhat-small teams. And while modifying the code, it's very clear that everything is very modular, which makes it easier to work with if you're not too familiar with the product.

However, I do also agree with their opinion regarding the team's skill level. I wouldn't consider myself to be too skillful as a software engineer just yet, since I'm still starting out and have a lot to learn. For this reason, it's sometimes hard to move between different products, because just as I'm getting familiarized with one of them, my time there ends and I have to move to another, which sometimes includes a new language altogether. 

I would have to agree, seeing the success of the businesses who have adopted this kind of application development, that in an environment like ours, with constant innovation and continuous delivery, it makes sense to switch over to a microservice-based approach, but it is important for companies to consider its implications and take the necessary steps to reduce risks involved with them. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Software Architecture

 This week, we read a chapter of Pete Goodliffe's Code Craft: The Practice of Writing Excellent Code. The chapter, just like this course, focused only on the importance and different types of architecture. After this reading and after having completed the first Ruby activity, I think I finally have a good idea of what to expect throughout the semester.  Throughout our degree, we have always been told how important it is to design before we start coding, so that we have a "guide" and to get an idea of the workload or work distribution from the beginning. However, so far, it hasn't been taught to us in this way; we would think about the code, abstract it into a higher level, and define our design based on what we thought would be easier to do.  However, I now see that the correct way to do it is the other way around. Think of what you want your software to accomplish, figure out its scale and any other relevant details, pick a style that fits your project's needs, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why is an architect?

  This week's (very short) article, Who Needs an Architect?, Martin Fowler explains to us the different definitions of architects that exist in the software world. The first and most common definition, which Fowler disagrees with, says that an architect is (s)he who helps identify what the most important parts of a project are, in order to give it structure. However, it is also mentioned that these parts are usually the most important because they are the hardest to change, so an architect's job should also include reducing the amount of these parts. Following the logic, by this definition, an architect's job is to reduce the amount of architecture.  The second proposed definition, which I also think I agree with, is that an architect's role is more like a guide's. His purpose is to help the team become better by using his expertise, and communicating with as much of the team as possible in order to remove their blocks. I think the word architect  still fulfills thi...
Post a Comment
Read more